🇺🇸 CIA
After interviewing three of the four witnesses of a reported flying saucer sighting, the CIA concluded there was no evidence supporting the existence of unconventional aerial objects. The reports suggested the observed craft could have been normal aircraft or even jets with high climb rates. Herbert Scovil, Jr., from the Scientific Intelligence Department, insisted on interviewing the fourth witness individually to obtain expert testimony not previously mentioned. The agency showed some reluctance to proceed without first gathering more information.
The document reflects the CIA's caution in handling reports of unidentified flying objects. Although the sighting had initially been given much importance, the interview results led to a reevaluation. Scovil recommended avoiding procedures that would delay the acquisition of key data. This type of document reveals how the agency sought to unravel seemingly inexplicable information with a methodical and critical approach.